Taking its cue from the theme of “Absorbing Modernity” assigned to the countries participating in the 14th International Architecture Exhibition, the aim of this essay is to trace out a path of reflection on Modernism and on what makes its lesson still vivid today. What are the most meaningful moments of a longsighted critical processing of the values transmitted by modernity? A historical-critical examination has brought out a common thread linking the work of outstanding personalities, for instance El Lissitzky in the early twentieth century or Cedric Price in the 1960s, in terms of key themes of modernity like an emphasis on social values and the sense of democracy in design, up to the current situation in which we find ourselves faced with an attention to the social that overflows to the point of resetting the official character of architecture in favor of its progressive fusion with events, whether real or virtual.

THE QUESTION OF THE “MODERN” IN ARCHITECTURE. A HISTORIC OPEN DEBATE, 2016.

THE QUESTION OF THE “MODERN” IN ARCHITECTURE. A HISTORIC OPEN DEBATE

MELLO P
2016-01-01

Abstract

Taking its cue from the theme of “Absorbing Modernity” assigned to the countries participating in the 14th International Architecture Exhibition, the aim of this essay is to trace out a path of reflection on Modernism and on what makes its lesson still vivid today. What are the most meaningful moments of a longsighted critical processing of the values transmitted by modernity? A historical-critical examination has brought out a common thread linking the work of outstanding personalities, for instance El Lissitzky in the early twentieth century or Cedric Price in the 1960s, in terms of key themes of modernity like an emphasis on social values and the sense of democracy in design, up to the current situation in which we find ourselves faced with an attention to the social that overflows to the point of resetting the official character of architecture in favor of its progressive fusion with events, whether real or virtual.
Inglese
2016
ARCHTHEO '16. X. International Theory of Architecture Conference
X
Istanbul
27-28 Ottobre 2016
internazionale
contributo
ARCHTHEO '16 X. International Theory of Architecture Conference
380
392
12
978-605-9207-51-5
Turkey
Istanbul
DAKAM (Eastern Mediterranean Academic Research Center)
comitato scientifico
A stampa
Settore CEAR-11/A - Storia dell'architettura
Settore CEAR-09/A - Composizione architettonica e urbana
Settore CEAR-08/C - Progettazione tecnologica e ambientale dell'architettura
1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mello Archtheo2016.pdf

Non accessibile

Dimensione 4.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.71 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10808/64128
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact