The differences between the narrative construction of cis and trans identities depend on the archetypes they are based on. The traditional models of hero’s journey, bildungsroman and autobiography provide cis narratives with structures that are centered on the hero’s Ego: any possible decentering tendency is solved by a re-centering countertendency. For lack of any traditional model, trans narratives, even when centered on the hero’s Ego, make the decentering process the primary narrative function: the re-centering attempts always appear provisional and other-directed. Trans narratives indirectly shed light on one of the oldest clichés of cis narratives: even when problematized, the Ego is a presupposition rather than an outcome, also because its gender identity lies ontologized and inert outside the limits of the narrative and often constitutes its horizon line. Only during the last two decades trans identities established themselves as autonomous subjectivities capable of elaborating their own narrative discourses, that is counter-discourses finally allowing them to write themselves into the discourses by which they have been written for centuries.

The irreducible multiplicity of sexes. A theoretical and comparative study on trans identities in literature and media, 2026-11.

The irreducible multiplicity of sexes. A theoretical and comparative study on trans identities in literature and media

Fabio Vittorini
2026-11-01

Abstract

The differences between the narrative construction of cis and trans identities depend on the archetypes they are based on. The traditional models of hero’s journey, bildungsroman and autobiography provide cis narratives with structures that are centered on the hero’s Ego: any possible decentering tendency is solved by a re-centering countertendency. For lack of any traditional model, trans narratives, even when centered on the hero’s Ego, make the decentering process the primary narrative function: the re-centering attempts always appear provisional and other-directed. Trans narratives indirectly shed light on one of the oldest clichés of cis narratives: even when problematized, the Ego is a presupposition rather than an outcome, also because its gender identity lies ontologized and inert outside the limits of the narrative and often constitutes its horizon line. Only during the last two decades trans identities established themselves as autonomous subjectivities capable of elaborating their own narrative discourses, that is counter-discourses finally allowing them to write themselves into the discourses by which they have been written for centuries.
Inglese
nov-2026
Ledizioni
11
427
445
18
Italy
internazionale
esperti anonimi
Online
Settore L-FIL-LET/14 - Critica Letteraria e Letterature Comparate
Settore COMP-01/A - Critica letteraria e letterature comparate
1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
27.VITTORINI2.pdf

Open Access

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 346.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
346.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10808/77148
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact