Long considered a ‘Ricardian socialist’, Thomas Hodgskin is rarely read as the perceptive observer of the Industrial Revolution that he was.Hismost famous pamphlet, LabourDefended Against theClaims ofCapital, has been interpreted as anticipating some central tenets ofMarxism. If we abandon this well-established interpretation, however, we can better appreciate Hodgskin’s acute reading of the process of industrialisation unfolding before his eyes. Unlike most socialists, Hodgskin had no sympathy for machine breakers and actually understood the importance of the entrepreneurial function. Moreover, he thought mechanisation and improvement in the tools available for workers would not dispossess them but, on the contrary, would raise their living standards. Hodgskin’s ‘optimism’ shows that in the 1820s someone who was deeply concerned with the future of the working classes could nonetheless develop a reasoned sympathy for industrialisation—rather thanmerely oppose technological innovation and long for a mythical past.

Thomas Hodgskin, Rational Optimist, 2018-02.

Thomas Hodgskin, Rational Optimist

Mingardi, Alberto
2018-02

Abstract

Long considered a ‘Ricardian socialist’, Thomas Hodgskin is rarely read as the perceptive observer of the Industrial Revolution that he was.Hismost famous pamphlet, LabourDefended Against theClaims ofCapital, has been interpreted as anticipating some central tenets ofMarxism. If we abandon this well-established interpretation, however, we can better appreciate Hodgskin’s acute reading of the process of industrialisation unfolding before his eyes. Unlike most socialists, Hodgskin had no sympathy for machine breakers and actually understood the importance of the entrepreneurial function. Moreover, he thought mechanisation and improvement in the tools available for workers would not dispossess them but, on the contrary, would raise their living standards. Hodgskin’s ‘optimism’ shows that in the 1820s someone who was deeply concerned with the future of the working classes could nonetheless develop a reasoned sympathy for industrialisation—rather thanmerely oppose technological innovation and long for a mythical past.
Inglese
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecaf.12276/abstract
38
1
38
57
20
United Kingdom
internazionale
esperti anonimi
A stampa
Settore SPS/02 - Storia delle Dottrine Politiche
Settore SECS-P/04 - Storia del Pensiero Economico
1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
document(128).pdf

accesso solo dalla rete interna

Dimensione 178.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
178.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10808/23945
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact