The term “deglobalization” describes the waning momentum of the globalist project, a trend accelerated by successive global crises, from 9/11 to the invasion of Ukraine. Like its predecessor, globalization, deglobalization is a multidimensional phenomenon, impacting geopolitics, economics, consumption, and modern communication (Tomlinson, Globalization and Culture, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1999). While early twenty-first-century critiques, even those opposed to globalization, often posited a unified “Empire” capable of integrating diverse interests (Negri and Hardt, Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Pres, 2000), the current trajectory suggests a tragical fragmentation that may manifest as distinct blocs: the former Atlanticist alliance already spoilt in two parts, the Sino-Russian sphere and the ambiguously positioned Global South. Furthermore, a divide is emerging between democracies experiencing “democratic regression” (Mounk, , 2018) and neo-imperial autocracies that promote anti-progressive rhetoric.

Deglobalization and the Metaphysical War: From the Split of the Empire to the Thrills of Annexiety, 2026.

Deglobalization and the Metaphysical War: From the Split of the Empire to the Thrills of Annexiety

Nello Barile
2026-01-01

Abstract

The term “deglobalization” describes the waning momentum of the globalist project, a trend accelerated by successive global crises, from 9/11 to the invasion of Ukraine. Like its predecessor, globalization, deglobalization is a multidimensional phenomenon, impacting geopolitics, economics, consumption, and modern communication (Tomlinson, Globalization and Culture, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1999). While early twenty-first-century critiques, even those opposed to globalization, often posited a unified “Empire” capable of integrating diverse interests (Negri and Hardt, Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Pres, 2000), the current trajectory suggests a tragical fragmentation that may manifest as distinct blocs: the former Atlanticist alliance already spoilt in two parts, the Sino-Russian sphere and the ambiguously positioned Global South. Furthermore, a divide is emerging between democracies experiencing “democratic regression” (Mounk, , 2018) and neo-imperial autocracies that promote anti-progressive rhetoric.
Inglese
2026
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-10257-7?page=2#toc
Jerome Krase, Zdeněk Uherek
Local and Global Impacts of the War in Ukraine
347
364
9
9783032102560
Swaziland
Cham
Palgrave Macmillan
comitato scientifico
internazionale
A stampa
Settore SPS/08 - Sociologia dei Processi Culturali e Comunicativi
Settore GSPS-06/A - Sociologia dei processi culturali e comunicativi
1
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10808/76867
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact